It is a strange day when I don't see a lawsuit where someone isn't doing something stupid that then causes them grief for untold years to come.
Take the case I read the other day, Goodrich v. Sierra Vista Regional Medical Center. Seems Doctor was hired. When her original contract expired, it was decided not to retain Doctor and Doctor was let go. Doctor didn't like that and filed a writ of administrative mandate contesting her termination (but didn't bother to show up to the hearing). When Doctor's writ was denied, she filed five motions in quick succession contesting the denial and each motion was denied (i.e. Doctor didn't win).
Sierra Vista petitioned to have Doctor declared a vexatious litigator under CCP 391(b)(2) and was denied (i.e. Sierra Vista lost). Not to be outdone, Doctor then filed one more motion to overturn the original denial. I guess it's like that one Monty Python skit where the extremely fat guy eat and eats and then pops when he eats that one last dinner mint. Anyway, Sierra Vista again petitioned to have Doctor declared a vexatious litigator and this time Sierra won. Huzzah!
The problem with being declared a vexatious litigator is that if it wasn't a pain just to have to jump through a bunch of hoops hoping to win your lawsuit (or defend against one), now you get to deal with a whole 'nother bunch of hoops, like:
Bottom line, if you're one of those persons who are easily offended or hold onto grudges for a long time, stay away from the litigation arena. I mean, stop before you leap because even if you can, it doesn't mean you should and you're probably best served to avoid the legal system altogether. I'm just sayin.
Take the case I read the other day, Goodrich v. Sierra Vista Regional Medical Center. Seems Doctor was hired. When her original contract expired, it was decided not to retain Doctor and Doctor was let go. Doctor didn't like that and filed a writ of administrative mandate contesting her termination (but didn't bother to show up to the hearing). When Doctor's writ was denied, she filed five motions in quick succession contesting the denial and each motion was denied (i.e. Doctor didn't win).
Sierra Vista petitioned to have Doctor declared a vexatious litigator under CCP 391(b)(2) and was denied (i.e. Sierra Vista lost). Not to be outdone, Doctor then filed one more motion to overturn the original denial. I guess it's like that one Monty Python skit where the extremely fat guy eat and eats and then pops when he eats that one last dinner mint. Anyway, Sierra Vista again petitioned to have Doctor declared a vexatious litigator and this time Sierra won. Huzzah!
The problem with being declared a vexatious litigator is that if it wasn't a pain just to have to jump through a bunch of hoops hoping to win your lawsuit (or defend against one), now you get to deal with a whole 'nother bunch of hoops, like:
- Under CCP 391.7, in addition to other relief, the court, on its own motion or the motion of any party, enter an order prohibiting a vexatious litigant from filing any new litigation in California in pro per without first obtaining permission from the presiding judge. A vexations litigant who disobeys this order may be punished for contempt of court.
- Under CCP 391.7(b), the presiding judge can require a vexatious litigant, prior to filing any litigation, to provide security to cover costs the defendant(s) may incur.
- Under CCP 391.7(c), the court clerk can refuse any litigation a vexatious litigant tries to file subject to obtaining a pre-filing order from a presiding judge to permit said filings.
- Under CCP 391.8(b), a person declared a vexatious litigant can file a motion to be removed from the vexatious litigant list. If their motion is denied, they can't file another application for twelve (12) months.
Bottom line, if you're one of those persons who are easily offended or hold onto grudges for a long time, stay away from the litigation arena. I mean, stop before you leap because even if you can, it doesn't mean you should and you're probably best served to avoid the legal system altogether. I'm just sayin.
No comments:
Post a Comment